Saturday, April 22, 2006

Nanny State?

While I would not state as strongly what Staub says here, I do agree with much of his assertion: "I guess I'm stunned that evangelicals, who set out in the 50's to 'engage the culture,' are still dialoguing about whether or not to go to movies." I diverge from his thought, however, where his broad strokes paint why evangelicals might not want to go to a movie: "Can you imagine the New Yorker reminding readers that, 'skipping a movie is a viable option?' These kind of comments make evangelicals seem like babies strapped into a high chair waiting for Dr. Dobson to tell them what to do next."

I'm one who likes to skip many movies and chooses not to "engage culture" with most of what's on TV or in the theater, but it's not because I want a nanny state or live in fear - it's because I think so much of it is garbage that is not worth my time. I think Staub might benefit by giving many intelligent Christians the benefit of the doubt when it comes to their hearts and minds. Many are so linked to God's word and the meat of his truth and work in this world, that devoting energy engaging pop culture seems unchallenging and time-wasting.

1 Comments:

At 4:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why didn't I know you had a blog? My comment is that I would challenge Staub's assertion that evangelicals decided to engage culture in the 50's. He's almost 20 years too early on that count, I'd say.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home